Wednesday, Google TV announced their new remote control application for Android devices. This comes as no surprise, and not just because Android is Google’s mobile platform.

Mobile devices are fast-becoming the remote controls of the future. Look in the iTunes store or Android marketplace… There’s definitely a growing trend. Loads of mobile apps are being introduced, to help us quickly manage our home entertainment equipments as well as find and view content.

The app, available in the Android marketplace, allows users to control their program guides, access their DVRs and send content from the mobile device directly to the TV.

Perhaps a bit more interesting are some of the other features – apart from the standard TV remote options (like changing channels or accessing your DVR). Using the Google TV remote app for Android, you can now interact with your TV in ways you never have before. For instance, try using the integrated voice search which allows you to find your favorite shows and movies just by speaking into your Android phone. Pretty slick.

Watch the official Google TV demo of the Android app:

Internet+TV= A Big Deal

It looks like Google is taking a step in the right direction. There are numbers to prove it.

In November, Logitech and independent research firm Wakefield Research announced the results of the Global Remote Control Trends Study. The survey of seven countries from around the globe revealed that consumers are ready for an entertainment overhaul when it comes to ease of use in the living room.

Nine of 10 (93 percent in America, 89 percent and higher globally) people believe their home-entertainment experience would be better if they could press a single button for their favorite feature film.

It makes perfect sense.

Tapping the touchscreen for our favorite movies is intuitive, not only because today’s mobile devices are smart and fast, or because touchscreens provide the perfect input device for the task. It’s because we’re using our touchscreen devices while watching TV anyway. Google TV is even adding voice control to the fray.

Google TV, Sony and Logitech aren’t the only companies up on the trend. Our beloved paid TV providers like AT&T, Dish Network, Comcast, Time Warner and Verizon have all launched or announced new apps for Android and iOS devices as a way to browse on-demand TV content.

This is all great. But what about the actual entertainment?

On-screen clutter disrupts real content.

If you recall, we’ve spoken before about the clutter on the Google TV screen. I don’t want to wait around while someone scrolls around ‘searching’ for something to watch. Doing that on the phone is just fine. It’s almost expected.

Clearly, ad-supported TV isn’t going anywhere. But please, remove that from the big screen. I want content.

A growing number of us are accessing the web, texting or chatting on our phones while we watch TV. We spend our entire day with these devices – so extending our TV viewing experience to the touchscreen and integrating voice commands just feels right.

But do we need the second-screen content on the TV screen? I think not.

And another thing…

I’ll close out with a quick rant. Indulge me for a moment…

Google TV doesn’t support Apple Quicktime video.

That’s just petty. Apple won’t play nice and support Flash video, so Google doesn’t want to take anyone to Apple generated content, in Quicktime. And to justify it by not supporting Microsoft content, in Silverlight either? C’mon.

I would have thought Google would be over that kind of tit for tat behavior. Grow up.

Revue is an Android-based, Google TV platform that allows users to access content from their cable/satellite receiver, personal digital libraries, as well as online content providers like Netflix and Amazon, from one location (your TV screen).

While much about the system’s controllers remains to be seen, one thing is clear: Logitech wants you to have A LOT of options when it comes “Google remotes.”

Logitech Revue with Google TV (via SlashGear)

Google TV is search-driven, which means that you can expect to do a fair amount of of work every time you turn on the TV. Locating and playing content using the Logitech Revue (or any future Google TV platform) requires cruising through an on-the-TV-screen interface, and typing search terms that could be related to whatever you want to watch.

So how does one control this system? With a complex cast of controllers from Logitech, of course. Let’s Revue, shall we?

Wireless (RF) keyboard

A Wireless keyboard is the primary controller. It’s included in the price of the Revue system ($299), and also sold separately for use with any (future) Google TV platform for $99.

This controller is a full-sized, PC-style keyboard. It includes a touch pad for moving an on-screen cursor, directional keys, and many randomly placed hard buttons for things like jumping to the home screen, and powering individual inputs like a cable box or AV receiver.

Mini Controller

The Mini Controller is a netbook-sized,  clam shell with full Qwerty keyboard, and a tiny circular touch pad that can also be used as directional keys. It looks a whole lot like one of Logitech’s controllers that never really caught on—the diNovo Mini.

Sold-separately for $129.99, the Mini Controller is adorable, but entirely unnecessary. Anyone who owns a Revue will already have the full sized wireless keyboard, and presumably their own smartphone, which can also be used as a remote.

Harmony App for Android and iOS devices

The Harmony remote control app (and pricing information) has not been released for either mobile platform yet. The app will eventually be available through Google’s Apps Marketplace (possibly other Android stores), as well as Apple’s App Store.

While it’s a cool idea to have a mobile app for controlling your Google TV instead of the big-ole wireless keyboard, it seems far from ideal. Various product demonstrations available on the web make it clear that Revue users will have to navigate through a lot of on-screen menus, type search terms, and then weed through search results in order to find and control content.

Since it doesn’t look like an easy user experience in the first place, asking someone to do all those things, while using a tiny controller that they will also use to control other components,  is asking a lot.

All the remotes in Logitech’s Harmony line

While it seems impractical,  you can also use any remote in the Harmony line to control Logitech’s Google TV.

I suppose if you already own a Harmony remote, having a separate hand-held controller for volume and other basic control, could be helpful. Though I don’t expect anyone will buy a Harmony remote specifically for use with the Revue, especially since the most inexpensive RF remote in the Harmony line costs $50 more than the entire Revue system.

What does it all mean?

Shoot, I don’t really know. Google TV itself is kind of an odd development. It’s blend of the old, new, good, bad, the incredibly awkward.

Good parts of the system already exist and are in use

The idea of having one central location where you can access all of your entertainment content is not new. You’ve known for years that you can connect your computer (and media center) to your TV. The people most interested in having this type of integration at home have probably already created their own web-connected entertainment center.

Even people who aren’t tech savvy are connecting to online content using gaming consoles and inexpensive hardware like the Roku player.

Will these folks spend an extra $300 (at least) to convert their existing set up to Google TV? Probably not. Will the rest of the population suddenly feel the need to change the way they watch TV because this technology is available? Probably not. But I’m sure they’ll enjoy learning about it on the Today Show.

My mom has probably known about Google TV for months. Will she buy one? Absolutely not; she’s still getting DVDs in the mail. Will I buy one? Absolutely not; I already have ways to get the online content I need—and it doesn’t involve a goofy on-the-TV-screen interface.

Bad parts of the system have already been rejected

Using one’s TV as a browser isn’t a new concept either. Remember WebTV? That was 12 years ago! And for the past two years, owners of TVs include widgets or apps, have been successfully ignoring those features.

Why didn’t these things take off?

It’s probably because much of what we do with our laptops, desktops and smartphones  is private—chatting with friends, paying bill, etc. Needless to say, we don’t want to share those things with other people in the room.

In the same vein, other do not (and will not) enjoy watching your personal stock ticker, baseball stats and IMDB searches while a movie is playing.

Kinks, quirks, and other less-than-ideal aspects to consider

Google TV is search-based. However, if you want to search through your saved DVR programs, the only way to do it is through Dish Network’s special Google TV package. Excuse me? Fail.

Or what about the on-the-TV-screen interface. It’s loud and colorful, some would even say it’s pretty. But before you temporarily fall in love because it looks like, “The TV of the Future,” consider the following:

Is there anything worse than standing behind someone while they do a Google search and slowly scan the results? No. Will watching family members and guests do Google searches on your TV make daydream about punching them in the face and ripping the keyboard out of their hands? Probably.

The concept of Google TV, one place for finding and managing entertainment content, is not the problem. The problem is the interface, and more specifically, how it’s accessed.

Why on earth would they put it on the TV screen? That’s where my TV show needs to go!

I wonder where Logitech stood on this one. I wonder if during the early stages they thought an off-screen control interface would be best. I bet at least some of them did. Were they forced to go with Google’s flow?

Logitech’s Harmony controllers are supposed to be all about simplicity—and baby, there’s nothing simple about controlling this beast.

All the complexity of controlling a home theater full of devices still exists after adding the Revue to your system. And it’s all topped with even more complexity and mandatory labor thanks to the Google TV interface.

Is this the future of home entertainment? I hope not.

VideoWave is the audio company’s foray into the visual side of home entertainment–it’s basically Bose’s answer home theater in a box. Comprised of a 46” LCD TV with built-in 5.1 channel audio (What?!), a separate processor, and a unique remote control, the system appears to be a feat of engineering on a number of fronts.

Bose VideoWave system - launching this month

While it’s fascinating that Bose managed to make a flat screen TV with built in speakers feel like surround sound (a point *some* audiophiles may disagree with), we think its FAR OUT controller deserves a bit more attention.

Called the Click Pad, the VideoWave system’s bundled universal remote is  more than a departure from Bose remotes past; it’s a departure from all remotes past.

Bose VideoWave universal Remote (photo via Engadget)

The Basics
Click Pad is the hand-held universal  remote that controls a Bose TV, its built in Wave audio system, proprietary iPod dock, and up to five different HDMI sources (cable, TiVo, Blu-ray player, Xbox, Apple TV, etc.).

Because it’s an RF remote, everything can be hidden in a cabinet if you like, and it will control additional through an emitter and optional jacks.

Programming disasters will be kept to a minimum since white glove delivery and installation/integration are included in the VideoWave purchase price. Sorry DIY-ers, Bose professional installation is actually mandatory.

The Controller

The Click Pad is extremely simple. In fact,  it almost looks like a prop because a lot of space is given to a small number of traditional buttons, directional keys, and a wheel shaped touch pad for selecting sources and navigating to through an on-the-tv-screen interface.

It is visually soothing, but we are a little concerned that usability may have been sacrificed in the name of simplicity. More on that later…

The Interface
To use the Click Pad to control the VideoWave and multiple audio/video sources, you simply tap the touch pad (Bose calls it a click wheel), which shrinks the picture on the TV screen, and pulls up a border-shaped menu of remote control commands for the selected input.

You then slide a finger around the pad in a circular motion, stopping it once the menu option you want is highlighted; then click to select.

Bose VideoWave on-screen control menu (photo via Engadget)

Because the command menus are fixed, once you’re familiar with the location of your favorites (like TV guide and saved programs), you won’t have to glide around the menu. Rather, you’ll tap the touch pad in the spot that corresponds to the location of the menu command on the screen; then click (watch demo).

Simplicity v. Usability

Using the click pad looks it will be fairly easy on the brain. The way you know the positions on the face of a clock without effort, Click Pad users will probably know the wheel/menu location of their favorite commands without effort. Though the interface is innovative, it seems like usability has take a back seat to simplicity.

Sure, it’s nice to look at the clean design of the Click Pad hardware. The problem with having menus instead of buttons for all but a few functions, is that it becomes more difficult to do the things you need to do with your remote.

For example, instead of pushing one button to pull up the TV guide, Click Pad users will need to complete two (or three) actions:  (1) touch the pad, (2) slide your finger to highlight the guide option on the menu, (3) click.

Now imagine having to deal with the Bose on screen interface in addition to the TV guide’s on screen interface.

Or what if you want to jump to channel 273? Instead of pushing three number buttons, users will have to complete at least six actions. And one can only hope that the cable box doesn’t jump to to channel 2 or channel 27 before you finish all six of those actions.

I hate to say it, but a more complicated controller may have been a better solution.

Who cares if your remote looks sleek on the coffee table if it means doing twice the work, and looking at extra junk on the TV screen all the time? Perhaps it would be an okay trade if you never watch TV, but feel like you need one in the house for the sake of completeness…

Installation & Programming Details

The installer will program  your Click Pad by firing a few commands from your existing remotes at the VideoWave’s IR receiver. The system then compares the signals from your remotes to an embedded database of IR command codes to identify what kind of devices you have, and what on-screen menus should be added to your system. Cool, huh?

We were curious about what users would do if their inputs ever changed. The very helpful Bose rep I spoke with yesterday assured me that it would be ridiculously easy for VideoWave owners to modify their inputs and update their remotes without professional assistance.

Though we know the system has an IR receiver that it uses for to identify connected devices, it’s still not clear (to me at least) whether you can use the Click Pad to control a device that isn’t in the embedded database. I wasn’t able to get an answer beyond, “The database is fully updatable.” Whatever that means… (hopefully it doesn’t mean you’ll have to wait for a firmware update).

Final thoughts

Regardless of our opinions on usability, Bose does get points for innovation and simplicity. It’s fun to watch companies get out there and shake things up. Who knows, maybe we’ll test the ClickPad later this month and fall in love.

T minus two weeks. Can’t wait to try it out!

**Learn more about the VideoWave: Bose; Ubergizmo; TWICE; Digital Trends; CrunchGear; Engadget; ZDNet; CNET; PC Magazine; USA TODAY

There’s a reason why more people haven’t seen the next RedEye universal remote for iPhone, iPod touch and iPad before ThinkFlood makes an announcement: They’re in disguise.

This RedEye mini, which looks drastically different from the original RedEye, was concealed in a custom-molded enclosure, so it could be carried public without attracting attention. When not in use, you would think it was just a standard RedEye base station. Very clever.

The plastic case, which comes apart easily, looks just like the original RedEye base station. When you pry the case apart, you quickly realize that what you thought was a RedEye remote, doesn’t even have a circuit board. And then you see it clearly—the elusive, much-anticipated RedEye mini is lurking in the shadows.

To reassemble the case, all you have to do is place the RedEye mini inside bottom of the acrylic RedEye enclosure before popping the top back on. An ingenious solution to protect future designs from lookeyloos.

One of the best bits is that the case looks like the enclosure FOR the original RedEye base station. RedEye remote hardware is seen so often, that even though this one looks a little weird because the power supply and dock connector are missing, it wouldn’t normally attract any attention in the field.

In fact, if ThinkFlood developer Justin Nguyen had not accidentally lost his RedEye mini at Watch City Brewing on May 25/26, the whole scene would have easily been dismissed as just another oddball-waltham-software-developer who didn’t want to go home fore the evening without his favorite Linux server in tow.

Click any image to enlarge

The Complete Lost RedEye mini Saga:

• This is ThinkFlood’s next iPhone, iPad, iPod touch remote—RedEye mini
• How ThinkFlood lost the RedEye mini
• How ThinkFlood conceals prototype RedEye minis

Watch City Brewing Company. A nice place to enjoy good Waltham craft beers. And if you’re a ThinkFlood software engineer named Justin Nguyen, it’s also a nice place to make the honest mistake of losing the next product in ThinkFlood’s line of universal remotes for iPhone, iPod touch and iPad—RedEye mini.

Justin Nguyen—a Northeastern University 2009 graduate and movie trivia master—is a ThinkFlood software engineer working on the RedEye app, the little program turns the iPhone, iPod touch and iPad into a high-end universal remote, when combined with RedEye hardware. A dream job for a talented engineer like Nguyen who always wanted to work at a hip, young company like ThinkFlood.

On the night of May 25, he was enjoying the fine house beverages at Watch City Brewing Company, a legendary brewpub in silicon savvy Waltham, Massachusetts. He was happy. After all it was his birthday. He was turning 24 that very same day and he was celebrating. The place was great. The beer was excellent. “I underestimated how good Waltham beer is,” he typed into the iPhone he was using to test RedEye mini hardware in the field. The RedEye mini he was testing earlier that evening sat beside him, cleverly disguised as ThinkFlood’s original RedEye remote. It was the last Facebook update made by Nguyen while he still knew the whereabouts of the secret universal remote adapter, right before he abandoned it on a bar stool, leaving to go home.

It was a simple, honest mistake in the middle of celebration. Something that anyone from Matt Eagar to Adam Shapiro could have done. Knowing how ferocious and ruthless ThinkFlood is about product leaks, those beers may have turned out to be the bitterest of his life.

(Almost) Impenetrable Security

Until now, ThinkFlood’s legendary security had always worked perfectly. Perhaps there was a blurry factory photo here, or some last-minute information strategically whispered to some friendly media there. But when it came to the big stuff, everything was airtight.

At their Waltham campus, any gadget or computer that is worth protecting is behind armored doors, with security locks with codes that change every few minutes. Prototypes are bolted to desks. Hidden in these labs, hardware, software and industrial-design elves toil separately on the same devices, without really having the complete picture of the final product.

And lurking in every corner, the ThinkFlood secret police, a team of people with a single mission: To make sure nobody speaks. And if there’s a leak, hunt down the traitor and escourt him out of the building. Using lockdowns and other fear tactics, these men in black are the last line of defense against any sneaky eyes. The Gran Jefe Matt Eagar trusts them to avoid ThinkFlood’s worst nightmare: The leak of a strategic product that could cost them millions of dollars in free marketing promotion. One that would make them lose control of the product news cycle.

But the fact is that there’s no perfect security. Not when humans are involved. Humans can lose things. You know, like the next RedEye remote, the portable RedEye mini.

Lost and Found
ThinkFlood security’s mighty walls fell (on the midnight of ) Wednesday, May 26. At that time, Nguyen was at Watch City Brewing, just 2.5 miles from the company’s Bear Hill Road headquarters, having his fun. Around him, other groups of people were sharing the jolly atmosphere, and plenty of the golden liquid.

The person who eventually ended up with the lost RedEye mini  was sitting next to Nguyen. He was drinking with a friend too. He noticed Nguyen on the stool next to him, but didn’t think twice about him at the time. Not until Nguyen had already left the bar, and a random really drunk guy—who’d been sitting on the other side of Nguyen—returned from the bathroom to his own stool.

The Random Really Drunk Guy pointed at the RedEye mini disguised as the original RedEye remote that was sitting on the stool, the precious prototype left by the young ThinkFlood engineer.

“Hey man, is that your RedEye base station?” asked Random Really Drunk Guy.

“Hmmm, what?” replied the person who ended up with the RedEye mini.

“No, no, it isn’t mine.”

“Ooooh, I guess it’s your friend’s then,” referring to a friend who at the time was in the bathroom.

“Here, take it,” said the Random Really Drunk Guy, handing it to him. “You don’t want to lose it.” After that, the Random Really Drunk Guy also left the bar.

The person who ended up with the RedEye mini asked around, but nobody claimed it. He thought about the young guy sitting next to him, so he and his friend stayed there for some time, waiting. Nguyen never came back.

Thinking about returning the Wi-Fi-to-infrared bridge the next day, he left.

When he got home, he downloaded the RedEye app to his iPhone and tried to play with the networked universal remote. I was buzzed and exhausted, so after trying to get it working for two minutes or so, I gave up and went to bed,” he told me in a telephone interview.

He had no clue that something was amiss. “It seemed like normal RedEye hardware,” he said. “It looked just like one—except I was confused because it seemed like the device’s owner was controlling bar TVs with it earlier in the evening, despite the fact that it had no power supply. I reasoned that maybe he took the AC adapter home with him and accidentally left the rest of it behind.”

When he woke up after the hazy night, he took a look at what he had carried home the night before. He immediately realized that there was something very strange about this RedEye.

At first it didn’t appear to have any special features, just a sticker that read, “JN’s Rm,” in the spot where you would normally find the device’s serial number, MAC address, FCC ID, and IC ID. All of the usual hardware identification numbers had been scratched off.

He already knew that the power cord was missing, but it was more than that. The 30-pin dock connector was gone too. He picked up the device and was stunned by what he hadn’t noticed in the crowded brewpub: something inside the base station was loose and rattling around.

He held the RedEye hardware up in the morning sunlight and finally saw that there was something other than a circuit board inside. After tinkering with it, he managed to open the fake RedEye base station.

There it was, a tiny and glorious thing, completely different from everything that came before. He immediately started Googling for the “JN” from ThinkFlood, who was sitting next to him the night before. Several minutes later he found a picture of ThinkFlood developer Justin Nguyen.

He reached for a phone and called a lot of ThinkFlood numbers and tried to find someone who was at least willing to transfer his call to Nguyen, but no luck. The company had recently relieved him of his occasional telephone duties so he could focus on finishing code for the in-app TV guide, that would soon be free for all RedEye remote users in the US and Canada.

He thought that eventually Nguyen would check his voicemail, and that he would receive a call back, but his phone never rang. The receptionists at ThinkFlood, who were unaware of the missing RedEye mini, thought the calls were part of an elaborate prank by ThinkFlood’s competitors (who often call to feel around for unpublished company and product information). Not to mention the fact that the caller’s tale was nearly identical to Gizmodo’s Lost iPhone Saga.

He thought that eventually the ticket would move up high enough that he would receive a call back, but his phone never rang. What should he be expected to do then? Walk into a retailer that sells the original RedEye system and hand the RedEye mini to a 20-year-old who might just end up selling it on eBay?

The Aftermath
Two days later, MoreControl.com got it for $100 in rolled quarters and a king size box of Swedish Fish. At the time, we didn’t know if it was the real thing because the RedEye mini didn’t work with the version of the RedEye app currently in the App Store (and all RedEye hardware is supposed to work with a single app).

Once we saw it inside and out, however, there was no doubt about it. It was the real thing, so we started to work on documenting it before returning it to ThinkFlood. We had the portable universal remote hardware, but we didn’t know the owner. Later, we heard the whole story, but we didn’t know for sure that it was Nguyen’s RedEye mini until today, when we finally tricked a receptionist at ThinkFlood to transferring our call.

Justin Nguyen: Hello?

Steve MacKinnon: Is this Justin?

J: Yeah.

S: Hi, this is Steve MacKinnon from MoreControl.com.

J: Hey!

S: You work at ThinkFlood, right?

J: Um, I mean I can’t really talk too much right now.

S: I understand. We have a device, and we think that maybe you misplaced it at a bar, and we would like to give it back.

J: Yeah, I forwarded your email [asking him if it was his RedEye mini], someone should be contacting you.

S: OK.

J: Can I send this phone number along?

S: [Contact information]

He sounded tired and broken. But at least he’s alive, and apparently still working at ThinkFlood—as he should be. After all, it’s just a stupid, little universal remote dongle for iPhone, iPod touch and iPad, and mistakes can happen to everyone—Justin Nguyen, Gray Powell, Phil Schiller, you, me, and Steve Jobs.

The only real mistake would be to fire Justin Nguyen in the name of ThinkFlood’s legendary impenetrable security, breached by the power of locally brewed beer beer and one single human error.

The Complete Lost RedEye mini Saga:

• This is ThinkFlood’s next iPhone, iPad, iPod touch remote—RedEye mini
• How ThinkFlood lost the RedEye mini
• How ThinkFlood conceals prototype RedEye minis

Click any image to enlarge

ThinkFlood’s original RedEye remote was the first complete universal remote control system for iPhone, iPod touch and iPad. It allows users to control virtually any infrared devices from any room in the home (without having to attach anything to their phone, MP3 player or tablet).  The RedEye system is a Wi-Fi-to-infrared bridge that can support multiple rooms, controllers (iDevices), and users simultaneously.

RedEye has been growing in popularity around the world since the product launched last December. In January, the RedEye app was selected to appear in iPhone print ads that ran in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Economist and Newsweek.

While ever-increasing RedEye remote sales and the company’s rapidly expanding list of distributors are sure signs that things are going swimmingly at ThinkFlood these days, the greatest testament to their success came last week when Apple started featuring the RedEye app in the What’s Hot section of the App Store.

Still glowing from the launch of the RedEye system, ThinkFlood is preparing to launch the second product in its line of networked universal remotes: RedEye mini. Think of it as the original RedEye remote’s little brother.

RedEye mini is a small adapter that plugs into the headphone jack of the iPhone, iPod touch and  iPad—transforming it into a completely portable universal remote. RedEye mini owners will be able to use their iPhones, iPads and iPod touch devices to quickly operate anything anything controlled by infrared signals, anywhere they go: TVs, DVD and Blu-ray players, set-top boxes, stereos, gaming consoles, etc.

The power… The anarchy… The RedEye mini. Okay, I’m getting carried away, but you get the picture.

While ThinkFlood may tinker with the final packaging and design of the final RedEye mini hardware, it’s clear that this lost-and-found RedEye remote—is drastically new and drastically different from what came before. Here’s a detailed list of our findings:

What’s new and exclusive to RedEye mini?

• Completely portable – Download IR codes anywhere using a 3G connection (or Wi-Fi). RedEye mini is much smaller than a thumb drive, and comes with a free carrying case
• The price—only $49—the most affordable RedEye universal remote yet
• Instant gratification – No waiting for IR commands to be communicated over Wi-Fi. Since RedEye mini attaches to the iPhone, iPod touch or iPad, IR commands for controlling your gear go straight from the application to the RedEye mini hardware
• Can also be used in conjunction with the original RedEye system for control in rooms without a RedEye base station, or to control equipment outside the home

What do RedEye mini and the original RedEye remote have in common?

• Compatible with iPad, iPhone and iPod touch
• The iPhone application itself–RedEye
• Database of 45,000 IR codes and ability to learn codes from existing remotes
• Nearly unlimited device and command capacity
• Activity-based control and macros
• Constantly evolving features and functionality
• Available in 52 countries around the world
• In-app TV guide (coming later this summer for users in the US and Canada)

Differences between RedEye and RedEye mini

• Power source – RedEye mini does not plug into the wall; it plugs into the headphone jack of any  iPhone, iPod touch or iPad (Note – a common, inexpensive headphone jack adapter is required in order to use RedEye mini with the first generation iPhone)
• Storage – With RedEye mini, IR codes and activity configurations (remote control button layouts), are stored on the user’s iPhone, iPod touch or iPad. Since the original RedEye is a multi-controller system, its codes and configurations are stored on the RedEye base station
• Dock connector – RedEye mini does not use Apple’s 30-pin dock connector; it plugs into the headphone jack of the iPhone, iPod touch or iPad. The originial RedEye remote does include the 30-pin connector, however, it is only there for convenient charging. Users don’t physically attach anything to their iDevices to operate the original RedEye system
• Line of sight – RedEye mini users must point their iPhone, iPod touch or iPad at the equipment they wish to control; while the original RedEye remote only requires that users be somewhere in range of their Wi-Fi network
• Internet connectivity – No Wi-Fi needed to set up or operate the RedEye mini. If users aren’t in range of a Wi-Fi network, they can quickly download IR codes for controlling their equipment (or anyone’s equipment for that matter), using a 3G connection
• Easier setup – Getting started with RedEye mini will be faster and easier than the original RedEye remote because the wireless networking element of the setup process is no-longer part of the equation

Click any image to enlarge

How it was lost
Here is a detailed account of how the remote was lost.

Why we think it’s definitely real
We’re as skeptical—if not more—than all of you. We get false tips all the time. But after playing with it for about a week—the overall quality feels exactly like a finished, final ThinkFlood remote—and after disassembling the unit, there is so much evidence stacked in its favor, that there’s very little possibility that it’s a fake. In fact, the possibility is almost none.

ThinkFlood first released information about RedEye mini in March of this year. Hardware renderings of the portable, super-remote were also released at that time.

Someone would have had less than three months to create their own functioning universal remote accessory that looks nearly the same as the renderings of the RedEye mini, and functions nearly the same as the original RedEye remote.

And if someone unaffiliated with ThinkFlood produced a working solution faster than ThinkFlood did,  and then chose to mark their creation with ThinkFloods logo… Well… Come on! Nobody would do that! Why would anyone do that?

Even more seriously though, considering how complicated it is to turn a standard headphone jack into a tiny modem that allows users to control any piece of infrared equipment in the world using an iPhone, iPod touch or iPad—something that’s never been done before—a pre-launch RedEye mini knockoff is pretty much impossible. Here are the reasons, one by one.

It has been reported lost

ThinkFlood-connected James Dellamort, Principle and Chief Engineer at design and consulting firm delResearch, says that ThinkFlood has indeed lost a prototype RedEye mini and they want it back.

So I called around, and I now believe this is an actual unit from ThinkFlood—a unit that they are very interested in getting back.

Obviously someone found it, and here it is.

The look
Here’s the most obvious reason why this little adapter is probably ThinkFlood’s RedEye mini (left): it looks a lot like the hardware renderings that ThinkFlood released in March (right).

It’s not exactly the same. The actual hardware is a bit more squared off than it appeared in earlier pictures. And the RedEye logo on the actual hardware is entirely black, not blue.

The real RedEye mini looks a little less like the antenna your phone had in 1998, and a little more like the antenna your phone wished it had in 1998.

The App
According to the person who found it, the mini and an iPhone were being used to control televisions at the bar where it was found—Watch City Brewing in Waltham, Mass. The person briefly saw a remote control button layout on the iPhone screen. We showed him several screen shots of the current RedEye app, and he confirmed that the screen he saw that night looked nearly the same.

How could the young man have been using what looked like the current RedEye application to control the RedEye mini? Easy answer—ThinkFlood informed us that all RedEye remote hardware uses the same application.

It’s likely that owner of the lost RedEye mini was running a not-yet-released version of the RedEye app, which included support for ThinkFlood’s new RedEye hardware. Since the company hasn’t submitted that software to Apple yet, we were not able to test RedEye mini hardware ourselves. [UPDATED - Minutes after we published news about the lost RedEye mini, ThinkFlood's crisis communications department got in touch and offered to share a version of their app that would support RedEye mini. According to ThinkFlood, they submitted the software release to Apple last week. See our demonstration of the RedEye mini in action at the end of this post.]

The camouflage case
The case the RedEye mini came in was an acrylic enclosure, possibly designed to make it look like the original RedEye remote.

However, it looks like they just pulled the guts out of a RedEye base station, put the mini inside and popped the top back on. It’s a perfect disguise.

The fact that it’s in the wild right now
Logic can also narrow down why this hardware is this year’s RedEye mini remote, rather than next year’s model or one from the previous year, just because it was found in the wild right now. It makes no sense for ThinkFlood to be testing 2011′s model right now, in super finished form—they wouldn’t be nearly done with it.

Since there’s no evidence to suggest that there was ever a 2009 RedEye mini, thinking such a thing would be a ridiculous exercise.

And for those of you who haven’t thought everything through yet, this device can’t be last year’s RedEye test model because a majority of last year components (based on original RedEye teardowns) were way different. The hardware we have in hand has no power supply, a much smaller board, no 30-pin dock connector, no Wi-Fi, no storage. That only leaves room for this to be the 2010 RedEye mini.

The guts, the definitive proof
And finally, when we opened it up, we saw multiple components that were shared by both the original RedEye and this new device.

Despite the RedEye mini’s much lower price tag, the folks at ThinkFlood appear to have kept the components bar high, using the same Vishay IR receiver modules and high-speed infrared LEDs across burgeoning product line.

Even if someone cared enough (and was clever enough) to create something that looks exactly like ThinkFlood’s yet-to-be-released RedEye mini, the chances that he/she would also care enough to use many of same key components as ThinkFlood’s original RedEye remote are slim.

How it feels
Freaking amazing. As a person who doesn’t actually have his own home Wi-Fi network, and who never really loved the hockey-puckish appearance of the (original) RedEye remote hardware, the tinier, sleeker, blacker, squarer design is super welcome.

It feels completely natural in your hand. And because it’s a lot smaller, it feels even nicer in your pants (I don’t care to explain why I ever attempted to carry a RedEye base station in my pants).

What all this means

It’s possible that the RedEye mini, at only $49, will perform better than universal remotes that cost three, five, even ten times as much. Not to mention the fact that those pricey home theater remotes aren’t meant for controlling everything, everywhere you go.
After spending a lot of time comparing the original RedEye and the RedEye mini side-by-side, it’s clear that the exterior of the RedEye mini is drastically different from that of the original RedEye.

Now you have a thinner body, a much more pleasant form factor with no wasted space. But the design isn’t the most important part that’s changed.

ThinkFlood has delivered may of the features that people have been waiting for—complete portability, for example—while at the same time upgrading everything else.

Folks who bought the original RedEye six months ago are now in the perfect position to add a RedEye mini to their system for controlling equipment in rooms without a RedEye base station. And of course current RedEye users who don’t feel like adding a mini to their system will still get to enjoy the other new features and improvements coming in ThinkFlood’s next software update.

ThinkFlood is really onto something with their futuristic line of remote controls. The iPhone SDK opened the door for their first products, but I’m starting to sense that in the not-too-distant future they will expand their offerings to include more mobile operating systems, and maybe even enter the realm of browser-based remote control and home automation.

Bottom line—RedEye mini is the thing that you always wanted, but hadn’t thought of yet. Okay, maybe you thought of it; but you didn’t make it happen, did you? It’s powerful. It’s cheap. And you’ll be walking around with the best party trick in town.

If you’re still asking yourself why this is appealing, here’s some inspiration:

• Don’t like those yappy (I mean lovely) ladies from The View? Feel free to change the channel at your mother’s house, even though she’s holding the remote. She’ll never know what happened.
• Desperately need to tune the nearest bar TV to the game that you actually want to see? Go right ahead. And when someone switches it back, you can feel free to change it again.
• Wish you could turn off all that noise when you’re the only one at the Laundromat and the TV is blasting at full volume? You can. You should.
• What about looking slick and completely together at your next important presentation? Only a true pack leader would unfurl the projector screen and control his slides with his phone.
• Upgrading to iPhone 4? Pack up that stack of remotes and use your old iPhone 3GS or 3G as your one and only controller.

If confirmed this summer, and if it performs as we expect, this next-generation RedEye remote looks like a winner. [UPDATED -RedEye mini performs as we expected. See video below of us using the lost RedEye mini with the RedEye software.]

The Complete Lost RedEye mini Saga

• This is ThinkFlood’s next iPhone, iPad, iPod touch remote—RedEye mini
• How ThinkFlood lost the RedEye mini
• How ThinkFlood conceals prototype RedEye minis

Immediately after I finished writing about Verizon’s remote control and DVR Manager apps, Comcast started talking about their Xfinity Remote prototype for the iPad. Good timing.

The app was demoed by CEO Brian Roberts at the Cable Show 2010 (see video below), and honestly, I was pretty impressed with what it had to offer. It looks like the app makes effective use of the iPad’s large user interface, which seems to be fairly uncommon among many iPad apps we’ve seen so far. Although, this is tough to judge until you get your hands on the app yourself.  The remote app also implements some useful features – most notably the attractive, searchable channel guide and the ability to invite a friend to watch a show “with you.”

[youtube RLz72XErN8U]

The Xfinity Remote works by sending a signal via Wi-Fi to a Comcast server that responds by telling your Xfinity box to perform the desired action. It’s a web-based app, so it should work on any device with a compatible browser (iPhone, Android, etc.) Although this seems like a great app, it lacks the ability to control any additional devices you have in your setup.

Both the RedEye and the soon-to-come RedEye Mini control your devices by emitting infrared signals. This gives you a significant advantage over the Xfinity Remote because it allows you to control not only your Xfinity box, but also any additional IR devices you have in your setup. And to make your RedEye experience even more enjoyable, the next software update is going to add a channel guide into the RedEye app (it will be released in roughly two weeks.)

But what if you can’t find the remote?? There’s an app for that. Verizon released an app that lets you use your handset as a remote control for FiOS. Unfortunately, this app is available exclusively for the Motorola Droid and the HTC Imagio.

Not for the iPhone?? Well, that’s a first. I’m guessing this is due to the fact that the iPhone is currently unavailable to Verizon customers, which might change this summer, but who really knows?  Fortunately, you can use RedEye to control FiOS and any other IR devices you have (TV, surround sound, etc.) with your iPhone, iPad, or iTouch.  Problem solved.

Additionally, Verizon has a DVR Manager App that allows you to browse through the channel guide, order videos on demand, record or delete content, etc. from anywhere that has wifi. Unlike the remote app, the DVR Manager is available for both the iPhone and Android platforms. Good job Verizon.

Hello, fellow remote control and home automation enthusiasts.  I’m a new contributor here at MoreControl.com, and a self-confessed home automation and home theater addict.  I’ve spent the last several years automating and tweaking various aspects of my home.  Much of the work has been of a practical nature, introducing user-friendly automation to conserve energy, monitor temperature, avoid water leaks, and simplify tasks for myself and my family.  Though, I’m certainly not averse to implementing something just to see if it can be done.  Lest you think that home automation is just for the über-rich to control their mansions, I thought I’d share a few practical automation features I’ve implemented in my own home. This is part one in a series of posts.

If you spend any time around kids, you’ll likely agree that they seem to not grasp the concept of turning lights off.  My children, for instance, constantly leave the lights on down in the basement when they’re done playing.  Our original solution was to install CFL bulbs to at least conserve some energy while the lights illuminated the empty space.  However, this was more of a band-aid than an actual cure.  We needed an easy way to tell that the lights were on and, subsequently, turn them off.  Ideally, the solution would also provide two more features.  First, we didn’t want to continually go down the basement stairs to turn off the lights.  Worse, we didn’t want to listen to the kids complain when we sent them down. Second, we wanted the lights to turn off automatically if we neglected to do it ourselves.

My current automation system is built primarily with Insteon devices from SmartHome.com all managed by an ISY 99i controller from Universal Devices.  The photo at the top of this post shows a KeypadLinc I installed in my family room (near the stairs to the basement).  You can see that a key is lit on the bottom-left that says “Basemnt Overhd”.  (Note that there’s an unfortunate limitation of 2 lines of text with 7 characters per line on the custom-etched keys, so abbreviate as best you can.)  With a little programming, I set up this key to perform several tasks.

• If either of the basement light switches is turned on, the key lights to let us know.  Likewise, the key goes out if both of the switches in the basement are off.
• Pressing the key will toggle the basement lights on and off with the key always illuminating in sync with the lights.
• A daily reset program runs early each morning to set various facets of the house into a desired state.  Part of this program ensures that the basement lights are off.

It’s a pretty simple bit of automation, but it has been extremely useful.  Not only are we able to save energy because we always know when the basement lights are on, it’s actually had two unexpected side-effects.  First, my kids find the automation so interesting that they frequently actually remember to turn the lights off (preferring to use the keypad vs. the light switches).  Second, my 4-year-old son doesn’t like to go down in the basement when it’s dark down there.  I showed him how he can now turn on the basement lights before even opening the door, and he loves it because he doesn’t need to find mom or dad to ask for help going downstairs any more.

Equipment list:

• Insteon KeypadLinc
• Custom-etched buttons for KeypadLinc
• (2) Insteon ToggleLinc Dimmer switches
• Universal Devices ISY 99i/IR Pro